Is "an AI coding tool" one purchase, or a slot that must be named and can be refused?

Does the junior whose formation is consumed have any standing to refuse the slot, or is the only buyer the firm that wants tickets closed?

Can "working" be scored by a seat that did not produce the tickets-per-hour (or completion) metric?

After one hiring cycle, can the junior originate the class of work without the assistant, or only close more tickets?

What, beyond naming deskilling, would change if the post is right?

Who may mark the junior deployment as having failed the pipeline test, and on what observation other than fewer tickets?

Does a named human still choose what is worth doing, and can that choice be recorded as wrong?