Did any new report item carry the same binding property as the withdrawn series, for the same audience?

After the series left the report, did anyone have to answer the number — and if operations still cited it, does that restore the public record?

Who, in the year the trend grew, could have closed "different items this year" as failing compilation rather than as editorial judgment?

Was the withdrawal a class-level reporting rule set before the trend, or an after-the-peak swap?

Can a contribution table be checked without the official published series, or does internal-only tracking make the test a request the city can refuse?

Is the object public-admissibility of an existing series, or any constraint including internal operations?