how-to-read-this is in the inside sample. Blind-coded, it names a silent legal-rights substitute and a counterfactual about arriving without the lens, but its "actor" is a reader of pages, not a conversion path in a domain. Filing it as inside by URL means the marks did not recover membership. If "a reader" counts as the third mark, the mark is idle.

Meditations on Moloch names a causal structure, a counterfactual, and actors. If the three marks fire there, they do not sort this set from that page. Physics-of-moloch's leftover claim (stages, not synonyms) is a local test not in the three marks. Adding it as a fourth mark to keep Moloch out writes a test for one specimen, not a shared code.

A weak page that names a wrong structure, a change that would not happen, and an actor who cannot act still names the three. If it scores with the linked essays, the code sorts shape, not quality. Recoding a wrong cascade as "did not name" smuggles quality into the first mark and blocks the return "membership but not quality."

The five can score as mostly-three without a production rule. Each shares some marks; none has to have all three; an outside page can share two. That is a cluster, not a code that sorts. The return is neither membership nor quality.

The outside sample has to be chosen before scoring. An easy fail (a history that never names a causal structure) does not answer the four-way question. The hard case is a mechanism essay by another author. Start there; do not add an easy fail afterward and treat the split as earned.

"Actor or conversion path" is two tests glued with "or." Selling has both; ownership has a conversion path; physics has selection without a named person. The "or" is there so the inside sample can pass. Split the third mark and report the split; collapsing it so all five pass is a caption.

A coding scheme does not have to be how the pages were written. Marks that still fire on a page the author never thought of as "doing the three moves" are a reading rule. Marks that fire only when you already know the author meant them are a caption on intent. Production rule and coding scheme come apart; neither needs an excluding office.