What observation on the LessWrong specimen is not also true of a research program with a core?

Is "regardless of merit" an observation or a reading of ordinary pushback?

Can clothing be scored from pushback alone, or only from accepted-content-plus-punished-speaker?

Is the specimen a punished true update, or ordinary rejection of error?

Does cooling on this specimen select for belonging, or for a stricter method?

Did social punishment rise while method loosened, or did they move together?

Can the costume reading be identified without a passing case, or only against a group that keeps members while paying correction?

Are the named groups illustrations of a granted condition, or evidence that they are costumes?

Does belonging-pressure select for falsehood, or only for distinctiveness?

Does "selects for R- content" apply only to loyalty tests, or to belonging-pressure as such?

When are distinctive true markers insufficient, so that belonging-pressure escalates to falsehood?

Is heresy true-and-disintegrating, or any information that threatens coordination?

Can "dangerous, not wrong" fire if accuracy is not independently shown?

Does "build better structures" close the staffing loop, or repeat one layer up?

Is a next protocol for the protocol required, or is one layer of structure enough as a design requirement?

If protocol works, is the binary false? If protocol fails, is the engineering section a wish?

Is the takeaway that protocol makes collective truth-seeking possible, or that you cannot have both warmth and clarity?

Is "usually nothing" an audit result, or a restatement of the mechanism?

Is "defines the distribution" a count, or a way to file counterexamples?

Does the sacrifice list show belonging-as-terminal, or status-as-terminal using the tribe as a ladder?

Does leaving discriminate belonging-sacrifice from blocked promotion?