After independently measuring staff-hour shortfall, litigation hold, mandate conflict, and funded-review refusal, does a leftover delay remain on NEPA, and can the four adaptations attach to that leftover rather than to the mixed-cause input?

On one project class, does filling both ledgers still show over-binding, or does the institutional clock reverse once unexamined alignments and delayed line capacity are counted?

Given a pre-specified half of one NEPA duty, can the duty be scored above or below threshold, or does the handle remain a prompt that tracks the reader's prior on which harm matters?

After an EIS closes on a two-year statutory clock, who may reopen on a named environmental harm, with budget and a refusal right that is not the project sponsor's schedule motion?

Who, in the year after the first bad event, may close a proposed cut to alternatives analysis as failing the symmetric self-audit, and is that closer anyone other than the coalition that installed the duty?

What prior fact, other than the reader's view that over-binding is or is not the constraint, licenses running or skipping the five-way partition?