If no recipient liquidates assets or avoids formal earnings, is there still a capability trap, or only a last-resort withdrawal schedule?

What, in an income-support package, performs the address function — not "unconditional cash" as a platform metaphor?

Can a treatment that is not last-resort social assistance identify the last-resort trap?

What would count as a last-resort withdrawal schedule that is 100% at the margin and still not a capability trap because it waits for stability?

Who, at enactment of a last-resort reform, may refuse it as failing the runway test rather than as too soft?

If childhood is the binding layer, what does a last-resort runway-preservation test change?

If yleistuki is asset-blind and last-resort still withdraws against savings, is the stack a capability trap by the thesis definition, or only after measured transitions?