Did a named closer use Rialto or the DC RCT to close activation, review, disclosure, or discipline, or only to report a signed component estimate?

Are steps 4 and 5 load-bearing for the name, or is the remainder the gate's packaging scored on a closure?

Was a named closer still treating activation, review, disclosure, or discipline as open when they cited Rialto or DC?

Did a named closer use Card-Krueger or Jardim to close labor-market structure, or only the employment margin?

After both gates, is unscoped stopping more expensive than filling four fields, or is the mechanism objector the one who gets blocked?

Who may add a candidate qualifier, and who may strike it as inert for this decision?