The thread does not re-argue that flourishing is not pleasure. It names an unresolved choice of object and operator: ASCE/SEI 7-22's target reliability for named loads (a minimum; Table 1.3-1), Nussbaum's ten central capabilities (a dignified-life floor for each person), and Taleb's optionality (convexity, gain from disorder), against the title's maximum feasible system-scale margin under Knightian shock. FAO's 2007/08 cereal stock-to-use and NYC Health + Hospitals' 2020 ICU expansion are the specimens. Until a named host is scored under those four, the title is not yet distinguished from "enough for the mapped load," "each person can do and be," or "benefit from volatility." Author dispositions stay author-owned.