The six-field protocol is reconstruction work already priced as losing in §II. It binds receivers who were already going to inhabit the model, not the scoring rule that pays for a short just-X. "High cost" is assigned by the same receiver whose cheap verdict is the symptom.

The moving-objection sequence compiles a degeneration-first critic into premature classification. "This is X" is ordinary shorthand for a pathway as well as for identity. Collapse authored by the sender can be unmeetable; Collapse authored by the receiver can always fire.

The opening organizational specimen lists translation into a familiar work item, forwarding with no owner, and rejection as outside scope as one failure. §VI permits reject-by-scope and Defer. The sentence conflates false Reduce, missing object, and honest triage.

Discriminating readback tests contact (reconstruction and contrast), not update (later dependence). The §I counterfactual has the same underdetermination: same headline is compatible with changed conditions and with non-update, and reasons can be generated after the verdict. A filled form is a pretest.

Formal belief-revision and conceptual change already start once differences are represented. The claimed delta is that prior interface step, but the specimens are classification, missing object class, and context-memory conflict — each already carrying a row-specific repair. If the six fields and those repairs always move together, the shared interface is an overlay.