Does a long reply that never moves a premise count as blocked contact or as evaluation that did not update?

Is contact an inner event (evaluation happened) or an outer one (a premise moved)?

What outer sign, besides a moved premise, distinguishes absorption from disagreement?

Would stronger evidence of the same kind be taken on the merits?

Can the diagnostic be scored from public replies, or only from inside the holder?

Is "values are subjective" a class example that does not need the slots, or a case that must fill them?

Does the pattern require agreed claim-type, or does the shield include type-disputes?

When both sides accept the claim-type and host, does the subjectivity line still close the question?

Is the diagnostic a name for a state arguments do not change, or a lever that is supposed to change it?

What, besides the cost crossing the page already names, would distinguish an immune system from delayed update?

Is refusing to accept filled slots a second abuse of the diagnostic, or just the anti-collapse gate working?

After the five slots discriminate, does a further specification demand change the label?

Is the new object a value ecology with no testable auxiliaries, or Lakatos applied to values?