Is the original the test must rule out Aoi, or the public template later users actually copy?

Is putting on the Laughing Man identity-template independent production, or the mimetic cell of the table?

Can a case that includes staged coordination be the clean picture of no coordinator and no copying chain?

Is SAC the first explanation when command is missing, or the leftover after coordination, copying, fashion, and independent discovery also fail?

If the claim is residual-diagnosis, which neighbors does the opening still tell you not to use?

Does the copy-chain test fire on academic methods, or is the fifth name only an observer-facing label for coercive plus professional norms?

Can a methods-shift cohort be shown that did not watch a predecessor's paper or a journal's list?

What dated reward-rule, written before RCT-as-rigor, predicts the methods shift without reading it off later publications?

Does a hypothetical earlier observer satisfy "identifiable before the convergence," or only a dated rule on the page?

Which domain, which evidence, which date of accumulation, and which later spread-window carry the persistence contrast?

Is the later window spread-after-settled-disconfirmation, or spread-during-live-dispute?

Is variance-denial an outcome this mechanism can cause, or a neighboring diagnosis the copy-chain test must keep separate?

Is the load-bearing cause the incentive, the journals, or a unit that already includes both?