The thread does not re-argue that maximin is one risk preference among others. It names three leftover fights the veil-as-choice claim does not yet pick among: Harsanyi's 1953/1975 impartial observer (the decision rule inside the original position), Nozick's Wilt Chamberlain argument in Anarchy, State, and Utopia (a refusal of the device), and Sen's 1979 capabilities plus 2009 transcendental-institutionalism critique (a change of metric and of job). South Africa's 1996 Certification judgment and Grootboom (2000) are the constitutional file: designers who knew their positions still wrote justiciable socio-economic rights and a property clause, and the Court later refused a minimum-core floor. Until those three fights are scored, "the veil is an axiological choice" is true and still underspecified. Author dispositions stay author-owned.